You have someone on the team who isn’t hitting the mark. You’ve been hoping it will turn around on its own. It hasn’t. Now every week you let it go, the problem gets harder to fix and the rest of the team notices. Here is the truth: most performance problems are not about the person’s ability or attitude. They are about missing expectations, missing feedback, and missing systems. Nobody sat down and made the standard clear. This page, and the 15 episodes behind it, will show you exactly how to set clear expectations, have the course-correction conversation, and actually get people back on track.

Why most performance conversations never happen

Managers avoid performance conversations for one reason: they are afraid of making things worse. They worry the person will shut down, get defensive, or quit. So they wait. And waiting turns a small performance gap into a full-blown crisis. The real problem is not conflict avoidance. It is that nobody ever gave that manager a repeatable structure for how to actually run the conversation. When you have a clear process, the fear drops fast.

The missing piece: expectations set upfront

The number one cause of underperformance is unclear expectations, not a bad hire. If someone does not know exactly what “good” looks like for their role, they cannot hit it. Before you can course-correct, you have to ask yourself one honest question: did I ever make the standard explicit? Not implied, not assumed, not buried in a job description. Explicit. Lia’s frameworks consistently point here first. If the expectation was never clear, the first conversation is not a performance conversation. It is a clarity conversation. Set the standard, confirm understanding, and give a fair window to perform to it.

How to run a course-correction conversation that actually works

Once expectations are clear, you need a structured way to address the gap. Lia uses The Sit Down framework for exactly this. The approach has three moves: name the specific gap with evidence (not a vague feeling), get the employee’s perspective before you prescribe a solution, and agree on concrete next steps with a defined check-in date. That last part is where most managers stop short. They have the conversation and feel relieved, then never follow up. Without the follow-up, nothing changes and you are right back to square one in six weeks.

Goal setting that prevents performance problems before they start

Reactive performance management is exhausting. Proactive goal setting is what makes it rare. When every team member has specific, time-bound goals tied to what the team actually needs to deliver, performance gaps surface early, while they are still small. Monthly or quarterly goal reviews inside your one-on-ones give you a natural, low-stakes moment to course-correct in real time. You are not ambushing anyone. You are just checking in on the plan you already agreed to together. That shift changes the entire dynamic.

Helping someone reach their potential versus managing them out

Not every performance conversation is about fixing a problem. Some of the best ones are about unlocking someone who is stuck, bored, or in the wrong role on your team. Before you assume someone cannot perform, explore whether they are under-challenged, unclear on how their work connects to the bigger picture, or missing a skill they could actually learn. The Manager Essentials Program covers exactly how to tell the difference between a motivation problem, a skill problem, and a fit problem, because each one requires a completely different response. Treating them all the same is the system gap that stalls good people and burns out good managers.

All episodes on this topic

Also relevant


Want to go deeper?

The Manager Essentials Program. Lia’s flagship program for new and rising managers.

Learn more